Cases 1 - 10 of 3,343
Gatlyn, Peter v. John Doe et al
as 1:2024cv22444
Plaintiff:
Peter A. Gatlyn
Defendant:
John Doe, Senior Chaplin Stasney, J. Dawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Retic v. John Hutton, et al
as 24-12082
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY RETIC
Defendant:
JOHN HUTTON and MICHAEL J. JONES
DAVIS v. POWERS et al
as 3:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
LAVAROS DAVIS
Defendant:
POWERS, JOHN DOE, JANE DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snell-Jones v. G.D.C. et al
as 6:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Zion Snell-Jones
Defendant:
G.D.C., Screven County, Screven County Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alfredo Bless v. Ricky Dixon, et al
as 24-12099
Plaintiff:
ALFREDO BLESS
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, RICK L. BRADSHAW, PALM BEACH BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS and others
KROFT v. RATHAL et al
as 1:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
JIMMY LEE KROFT
Defendant:
RATHAL, JOHN DOE and K M ROSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 4:2024cv00248
Petitioner:
JOHN MOORE, III
Respondent:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FRANKLIN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. DeSantis et al
as 3:2024cv00626
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Cole
Defendant:
Ron DeSantis, City of Jacksonville, Patrick Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz v. Alba et al
as 5:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Ortiz
Defendant:
FNU Alba, FNU Ozokpor, FNU Reins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Moore v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2024cv01081
Plaintiff:
John Moore, III
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections and Franklin Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
