Cases 1 - 10 of 177
MURZIKE v. CARR et al
as 3:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
J E CARR, T DYKES, C W CATTNACH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Lane et al
as 3:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
Freddie J. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Lane, Hale, Lance Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HENDERSON v. LANE et al
as 3:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
KEITH HENDERSON
Defendant:
SERGEANT LANE, HARRIS, T WYATT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HAWKINS v. COLLINS et al
as 1:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
MARK HAWKINS
Defendant:
LANE COLLINS and WAGER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens, Jr. v. Crews et al
as 3:2024cv00210
Plaintiff:
Albert T. Owens, Jr.
Defendant:
C. Lane, C. Crews, A. Figueroa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jonchuck, Jr. v. Dixon et al
as 3:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
John N. Jonchuck, Jr.
Defendant:
Ricky D. Dixon, Christopher Lane, Stephens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eckerd v. Jump et al
as 2:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Andrew William Eckerd
Defendant:
Sheriff E. Neal Jump, Rebecca J. Walden, Roger B. Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodney Lane, Sr. v. Unit Mg Ms. Martin, et al
as 23-14001
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RODNEY MANGON LANE, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIT MG MS. MARTIN, MEDICAL SERVICES, WARDEN and others
Lance Braham v. Camacho et al
as 1:2023cv24146
Plaintiff:
Lance Braham
Defendant:
W. Gonzalez Camacho, John Doe, Warden Boan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
HAWKINS v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al
as 1:2023cv00242
Plaintiff:
MARK HAWKINS
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REDWINE, SIKES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
