Cases 1 - 10 of 17
BROOKS v. TOBY et al
as 5:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
STANLEY BROOKS
Defendant:
WARDEN ANNETTIA TOBY, DEPUTY WARDEN JEREMY FOTSON, DEPUTY WARDEN CALPURNIA WASHINGTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MACK v. CITY OF MARIANNA et al
as 3:2023cv24646
Plaintiff:
LADARIUS NAJUAN MACK
Defendant:
CITY OF MARIANNA, TYLER SCARBOROUGH, MARIANNA POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MACK v. CITY OF MARIANNA et al
as 5:2023cv00269
Plaintiff:
LADARIUS NAJUAN MACK
Defendant:
CITY OF MARIANNA, TYLER SCARBOROUGH, MARIANNA POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPRADLIN et al v. TOBY et al
as 5:2023cv00328
Plaintiff:
LISA SPRADLIN
Defendant:
WARDEN ANNETTIA TOBY, DEPUTY WARDEN GEORGE IVEY, OFFICER STEPHANIE MACKLIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CADET v. WHEATON et al
as 3:2023cv17134
Plaintiff:
MIKE CADET
Defendant:
WHEATON, WHITE, BURDETTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shingleton v. Anderson et al
as 6:2020cv00019
Defendant:
Cpl. Perkins, Asst. DA Daffney Black, Atty Chief Council Steven Yekell and others
Plaintiff:
Isiah Shingleton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCARBOROUGH v. CENTURION et al
as 5:2018cv00270
Defendant:
A CORDERO, CENTURION and BARBARA BLOCKER
Plaintiff:
JAMES SCARBOROUGH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elmore Cook, Jr. v. Rucker, et al
as 18-10573
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELMORE COOK, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
RUCKER, TELAMATE, GRAY and others
Cook v. Rucker et al
as 2:2018cv00165
Plaintiff:
Elmore Cook, Jr
Defendant:
Rucker, Telamate, Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUTLAND v. WILLIAMSON et al
as 7:2015cv00160
Plaintiff:
ISRAEL TIMOTHY RUTLAND
Defendant:
CASEY D WILLIAMSON, ROBERT BRANNEN, FLOYD COSPELICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
