Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Taylor et al
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Taylor, III, Deborah R. Mangum, Leonard K. Sweatman and others
Defendant:
Piedmont Healthcare, Inc. and University Health Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1362 ERISA
STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY v. FEDRICK et al
as 7:2023cv00129
Plaintiff:
STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
TORRII SHAREKA FEDRICK, PHIL LAMAR FEDRICK, JR., PHIL'NESIA LASHASE FEDRICK and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Taylor et al v. University Health Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00047
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Taylor, III, Deborah R. Mangum, Leonard K. Sweatman and others
Defendant:
University Health Services, Inc. and Piedmont Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
LAMAR v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
as 5:2022cv00394
Plaintiff:
REGINA R. LAMAR
Defendant:
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
BRIDGES v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
as 5:2015cv00117
Plaintiff:
DAVID LAMAR BRIDGES
Defendant:
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Paxton v. Life Insurance Company of North America
as 8:2013cv00139
Plaintiff:
Terrence Lamar Paxton
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Hendrix v. CIGNA Life Insurance Company of New York
as 7:2012cv00863
Plaintiff:
James Lamar Hendrix
Defendant:
CIGNA Life Insurance Company of New York
Counter_claimant:
CIGNA Life Insurance Company of New York
Counter_defendant:
James Lamar Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Johnson et al v. South Alabama Road Builders, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2009cv00417
Plaintiff:
Ricky Lamar Johnson, Ricky Lamar Johnson, Lynn Harwell Andrews and others
Defendant:
South Alabama Road Builders, L.L.C., Gary D. Skipper and Mickey E. Skipper
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
