Cases 1 - 10 of 11
United States of America v. D.R. Horton, Inc.
as 8:2020cv02271
Defendant:
D.R. Horton, Inc.
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1319
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP v. CITY OF VALDOSTA GEORGIA et al
as 7:2020cv00050
Defendant:
CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF VALDOSTA GEORGIA, VIVIAN MILLER-CODY, ERIC HOWARD and others
Plaintiff:
CELLCO PARTNERSHIP
D.L. MAYER, LLC v. Tim Hortons USA, Inc.
as 1:2018cv21751
Plaintiff:
D.L. MAYER, LLC
Defendant:
Tim Hortons USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Federal Trade Commission v. Consumer Defense, LLC et al
as 6:2018mc00007
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Consumer Defense, LLC, Consumer Link, Inc., Preferred Law, PLLC and others
Receiver:
Thomas W. McNamara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Ferrari v. D.R. Horton, Inc.-Birmingham
as 1:2017mi00043
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Ferrari
Defendant:
D.R. Horton, Inc.-Birmingham
Horton et al v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
as 2:2015cv00565
Defendant:
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
Plaintiff:
Lucy Horton and Oscar Tapia
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Horton v. Harrison et al
as 2:2013cv01940
Plaintiff:
Harry D Horton
Defendant:
Steve Harrison and Lisa Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Horton v. United Food and Commercial Worker's Union
as 5:2012cv02962
Plaintiff:
Tammy Horton
Defendant:
United Food and Commercial Worker's Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Horton Homes, Inc. et al v. Bandy et al
as 1:2009cv00062
Plaintiff:
Horton Homes, Inc.
Defendant:
Larue Bandy, Marie Bandy, Patrick Pritchett and others
Movant:
Mauldin & Jenkins, CPA, LLC
Cause Of Action: FRCP 45(b) Motion to quash or modify subpoena
Horton Homes, Inc. et al v. Bandy et al
as 1:2008mi00435
Plaintiff:
Horton Homes, Inc.
Defendant:
Larue Bandy, Marie Bandy, Patrick Pritchett and others
Movant:
Mauldin & Jenkins, CPA, LLC
Cause Of Action: FRCP 45(b) Motion to quash or modify subpoena
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
