Cases 91 - 100 of 468
Llamas et al v. U.S. Department of Justice
as 6:2020cv02221
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice
Plaintiff:
Noelle Llamas and Ken Klippenstein
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552
Hooker v. USDOJ - Executive Office of United States Attorneys
as 8:2020cv02749
Plaintiff:
Carlton Eugene Hooker, Jr.
Defendant:
USDOJ - Executive Office of United States Attorneys
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552
Hooker v. Department of Veterans Affairs
as 8:2020cv02750
Plaintiff:
Carlton Eugene Hooker, Jr.
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552
Gonzalez v. Justice et al
as 1:2021cv20001
Defendant:
usda and The Department of Justice
Plaintiff:
Joey D Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552
Cooper v. Department of the Treasury et al
as 1:2019cv02056
Defendant:
Department of the Treasury, Commissioner of Internal Revenue and Internal Revenue Service
Plaintiff:
Garth Cooper
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552 Freedom of Information Act
Catholic Charities Legal Services, Archdiocese of Miami, Inc. v. Director of Office of Information Programs and Services, U.S. Department of State et al
as 1:2020cv23846
Defendant:
U.S. Department of State and Director of Office of Information Programs and Services, U.S. Department of State
Plaintiff:
Catholic Charities Legal Services, Archdiocese of Miami, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552
Curry v. NSA
as 3:2020cv01167
Plaintiff:
James Prescott Curry, Esquire, P.A.
Defendant:
National Security Agency (NSA) and NSA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552
Teo v. United States Internal Revenue Service
as 9:2020cv81351
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service and United States Internal Revenue Service
Plaintiff:
Alfred S.K. Teo
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552
Hooker v. Wilkie et al
as 8:2020cv01248
Plaintiff:
Carlton E. Hooker, Jr.
Defendant:
Robert Wilkie and William Barr
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
