Cases 71 - 80 of 530
Franklin Smith v. Freddie Burton, et al
as 21-10801
Defendant / Appellee:
RACHEL SMITH, LINDA STEELE, a.k.a. Linda Smith, FREDDIE BURTON, Probate Judge and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANKLIN C. SMITH
Joseph Parrott, Sr. v. Thomas Saittia, et al
as 21-10729
Defendant / Appellee:
FRED D. FRANKLIN, JR., THOMAS C. SAITTIA and ANDREI LANCU
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSEPH PARROT, SR. and JOSEPH PARROTT, SR.
Franklin Smith v. Nancy Pelosi, et al
as 21-10606
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS and NANCY PELOSI
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FRANKLIN C. SMITH
Heard v. Director, Office of Information Policy, et al. (MAG+)
as 2:2021cv00125
Defendant:
Louis Vinson Franklin, Sr. and Director, Office of Information Policy
Plaintiff:
Freddie Demond Heard
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Paul Luxama v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 21-10418
Defendant / Appellee:
C. NEEL, Secretary's Specialist for FDOC, FRANKLIN CI WARDEN, TAYLOR CI WARDEN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL LUXAMA
GRP MADISON LLC et al v. MASTEC INC et al
as 3:2021cv00009
Plaintiff:
GRP-MADISON LLC, GRP-FRANKLIN LLC, GEORGIA RENEWABLE POWER LLC and others
Defendant:
MASTEC INC and MASTEC POWER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Earwood v. AmerAssist A/R Solutions
as 4:2021cv00045
Plaintiff:
Franklin Earwood
Defendant:
AmerAssist A/R Solutions
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Shaquille Parker v. Elmore CF Warden, et al
as 20-14495
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHAQUILLE PARKER
Defendant / Appellee:
BILL FRANKLIN, Elmore County Sheriff and ELMORE CF WARDEN
John FranklinIn re: John Franklin
as 20-14491
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
In re: JOHN E. FRANKLIN
Schoenbaum et al v. Morales
as 8:2020cv02811
Plaintiff:
Adam Schoenbaum, Wesson Ventures LLC and Wesson Ventures, LLC
Defendant:
Franklin E Morales and Franklin E. Morales
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
