Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Tyrone Kemp v. Kevin Pogorzelski
as 24-11519
Plaintiff:
TYRONE ANTHONY KEMP
Defendant:
KEVIN POGORZELSKI
USA v. Dwayne Kemp
as 22-13723
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DWAYNE BASIL KEMP
Kemp v. Insurance Supermarket Inc.
as 1:2022cv21529
Plaintiff:
Marla Kemp
Defendant:
Insurance Supermarket Inc.
3Rd Party Defendant:
John Doe, Digital Thrive, LLC and Excel Impact, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Pinilla v. Kemp
as 6:2022cv00817
Plaintiff:
Jhulu Pinilla and Jhuly Pinilla
Defendant:
Bobby M. Kemp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Kemp v. Door Dash
as 6:2022cv00692
Plaintiff:
Bobby M. Kemp
Defendant:
Door Dash
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
The State of Georgia et al v. Biden et al
as 1:2021cv00163
Plaintiff:
The State of Georgia, The State of Alabama, The State of Idaho and others
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Safer Federal Workforce Task Force, United States Office of Personnel Management and others
Not Yet Classified:
Associated Builders and Contractors of Georgia, Inc.
Amicus Curiae:
American Medical Association
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv01441
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Timothy Littlejohn v. Governor, et al
as 21-13548
Petitioner / Appellant:
TIMOTHY DEWAYNE LITTLEJOHN
Respondent / Appellee:
JOE BIDEN, CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL CARR, MERRICK B. GARLAND and others
Defendant / Appellee:
VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00777
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02066
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
