Other Statutes Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Charles GivensIn re: Charles Givens
as 22-13462
Petitioner: In re: CHARLES GIVENS
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
John Givens v. Warden, Ventress Correctional Facility, et al
as 21-13967
Petitioner / Appellant: JOHN HENRY GIVENS
Respondent / Appellee: WARDEN, VENTRESS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Nichols et al v. Apple, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2021cv01380
Plaintiff: Nichols, Joseph Patrick Nichols, David Blietz and others
Defendant: Apple, Inc. and Apple Inc
Nichols et al v. Apple, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00487
Plaintiff: Jospeh Patrick Nichols, David Blietz, Nell Motley and others
Defendant: Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1030
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00229
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00131
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Charles Givens v. Secretary, Department of Corr., et al
as 20-14112
Respondent / Appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA and SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner / Appellant: CHARLES GIVENS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00942
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Rashad Lee v. Gwendolyn Givens, et al
as 19-13246
Defendant / Appellee: STEVEN T. MARSHALL, The Attorney General of the State of Alabama and GWENDOLYN GIVENS, Warden
Petitioner / Appellant: RASHAD C. LEE
Penning v. Intrinsic Tel LLC et al
as 1:2019mi00061
Defendant: Kerry Reddick, Envision Investments LLC, Earnest Earvin, III and others
Plaintiff: Matthew Penning
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?