Cases 1 - 10 of 10
CAMPBELL et al v. PHOEBE PUTNEY HEALTH SYSTEM INC et al
as 1:2020cv00164
Plaintiff:
TYRAFRED CAMPBELL, FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION and STATE OF GEORGIA
Defendant:
PHOEBE PUTNEY HEALTH SYSTEM INC, HOSPITAL AUTHORITY OF ALBANY-DOUGHERTY COUNTY, HCA INC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053
Federal Trade Commission v. Phoebe Putney Health System, I, et al
as 11-12906
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant - Appellee:
PHOEBE PUTNEY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC., PHOEBE PUTNEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC., PHOEBE NORTH, INC. and others
:
SERVICE
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00058
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission and State of Georgia
Defendant:
Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc. , Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital, Inc. , Phoebe North, Inc. and others
Objector:
Hospital Authority of Valdosta and Lowndes County
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053 Federal Trade Commission Act
Access Now, Inc., et al v. Ambulatory Surgery, et al
as 1:1999cv00109
Plaintiff:
Access Now, Incorporated , Linda Diedel , Madeleine Ferguson and others
Defendant:
Cedars Healthcare Group, Ltd. , A.C. Med, LLC , Acadiana Care Center, Inc. and others
Mediator:
Karen Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Wood et al v. Archbold Medical Center, Inc. et al
as 7:2007cv00109
Plaintiff:
Mark G. Wood
Defendant:
Archbold Medical Center Inc , John D. Archbold Memorial Hospital, Inc. , Ken B. Beverly and others
Movant:
William A Thompson , TPA Captive Insurance Company Inc , Quincy Dialysis, Tallahassee Dialysis, West Tallahassee Dialysis, Tallahassee South, Madison Four-Freedom and others
Objector:
Quincy Dialysis, Draffin & Tucker, C.P.A. and Sewell, Morgan & Hilliard, P.C.
Counter_claimant:
Mel Hartsfield , Archbold Medical Center Inc , John D. Archbold Memorial Hospital, Inc. and others
Counter_defendant:
Mark G. Wood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Archbold Medical Center, Inc. et al v. Wood
as 1:2009mi00042
Plaintiff:
Archbold Medical Center, Inc., Archbold Medical Center, Inc., John D. Archbold Memorial Hospital, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Mark G. Wood
Cause Of Action: FRCP 45(b) Motion to quash or modify subpoena
Palmyra Park Hospital, Inc. v. Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital, Inc. et al
as 1:2008mc00002
Plaintiff:
Palmyra Park Hospital, Inc., Palmyra Park Hospital, Inc. and Palmyra Park Hospital, Inc.
Defendant:
Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital, Inc., Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital, Inc., Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital, Inc. and others
Movant:
Blue Cross Blue Shield Healthcare Plan of Georgia, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Palmyra Park Hospital, Inc. v. Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital, Inc. et al
as 1:2008mi00431
Plaintiff:
Palmyra Park Hospital, Inc., Palmyra Park Hospital, Inc. and Palmyra Park Hospital, Inc.
Defendant:
Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital, Inc., Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital, Inc., Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: FRCP 45(b) Motion to quash or modify subpoena
Premier Anesthesia, LLC et al v. Bethesda Memorial Hospital, Inc. et al
as 2:2008mc03426
Plaintiff:
Premier Anesthesia, LLC, Premier Anesthesia, LLC and Premier Anesthesia, LLC
Defendant:
Bethesda Memorial Hospital, Inc., Bethesda Memorial Hospital, Inc., Bethesda Memorial Hospital, Inc. and others
Movant:
Bethesda Memorial Hospital, Inc., Bethesda Memorial Hospital, Inc. and Bethesda Memorial Hospital, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Palmyra Park Hospital, Inc. d/b/a Palmyra Medical Center v. Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00102
Plaintiff:
Palmyra Park Hospital, Inc. d/b/a Palmyra Medical Center, Palmyra Park Hospital, Inc. d/b/a Palmyra Medical Center and Palmyra Park Hospital, Inc. d/b/a Palmyra Medical Center
Defendant:
Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital, Inc., Phoebe Putney Health System Inc. and Hospital Authority of Albany / Dougherty County
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
