Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Bosarge et al v. United States Department of the Treasury et al
as 2:2022cv00407
Plaintiff:
Patrick Charest, Clifford Ellis, Robert George and others
Defendant:
United States Department of the Treasury, Janet L. Yellen, Kay E. Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00501
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00678
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2017cv01346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Allen, et al v. AL Board/Education, et al
as 2:1981cv00697
Plaintiff:
Margaret T. Allen , Yolanda F. Lamar and Beverly K. Jones
Defendant:
The Alabama State Board of Education , Fob James , John M. Tyson, Jr. and others
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Board of Trustees for Alabama State University , Eria P. Smith , Judy P. Lockhart and others
Amicu:
National Evaluation System, Inc.
Movant:
Don Siegelman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Lane et al
as 1:2009mc00033
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Robert E. Lane and Wealth Pools International, Inc.
Dell-Powell et al v. Lane et al
as 2:2007mc03380
Receiver:
Denise D. Dell-Powell
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission and Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Robert E. Lane, Wealth Pools International, Inc., Recruit for Wealth, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
