Cases 1 - 10 of 504
Kelly v. Alabama Department of Rehabilitation Services et al
as 2:2024cv00343
Petitioner:
Gregory Kelly
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Rehabilitation Services doing business as Alabama Department of Rehabilitation Service ("ADRS"), Charles Wilkinson, Kevin Kidd and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02505
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02416
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
TUCKER v. HARRIS et al
as 4:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
READERLYNN CARTER TUCKER
Defendant:
MARK HARRIS, ALETHEA HARRIS, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WHITE HAIR SOLUTIONS LLC v. GIDEON CAPITAL INVESTMENTS & MANAGEMENT LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
WHITE HAIR SOLUTIONS, LLC, A WISCONSIN LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
Defendant:
GIDEON CAPITAL INVESTMENTS & MANAGEMENT, LLC, A FLORIDA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, DIEGO AIZCORBE and CHUCK WALKER
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
In re: Elbert Walker
as 24-11154
Petitioner:
In re: ELBERT WALKER
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Neil WalkerIn re: Neil Walker
as 24-10597
Petitioner:
In re: NEIL WALKER
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00391
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
