Civil Rights Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 111 - 120 of 294
COOK-DUNSCHEE v. NAVICENT HEALTH
as 5:2018cv00282
Plaintiff: YALONDA MARIA COOK-DUNSCHEE
Defendant: NAVICENT HEALTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sundy et al v. Friendship Pavilion Acquisition Company, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv00112
Defendant: Friendship Pavilion Acquisition Company, LLC, Michael Weinstein, Richard T. Winegarden and others
Plaintiff: David Sundy, Nova-Lee Graber and Tim Sundy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00952
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-12528
Plaintiff - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2018cv00815
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Howell v. Underwood et al
as 3:2018cv00760
Plaintiff: Jessie Lee Howell
Defendant: William Jordan Underwood, Michael Cody, Kim T Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hoti v. Bank Of America, N.A., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2018cv80657
Plaintiff: Skender Hoti
Defendant: Bank Of America, N.A., The Liebler, Gonzalez & Portuondo Law Firm, Berit Friffin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Cook et al
as 3:2018cv00046
Plaintiff: Abigail Smith
Defendant: Chad Cook and City of Carrollton, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00442
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv00071
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?