Civil Rights Cases filed in Alabama
Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00953
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Smith v. Tio et al
as 1:2013cv01923
Plaintiff: Arnold Lee Smith
Defendant: Emilio Tio, John Rathman, Michael Blount and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Roebuck et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv01291
Plaintiff: James Williams, III
Defendant: Roebuck, Verin and Tim Arnold
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Weaver v. Roper et al
as 2:2013cv01132
Plaintiff: Anthony Carl Weaver
Defendant: A C Roper, Jason Arnold and Curtis Thornton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Powell et al v. Gorham et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv00055
Plaintiff: Richard M Powell and Belinda Stephens
Defendant: L Stephen Wright , Najjar Denaburg PC , Wendy B Crew and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv04071
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00229
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00930
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Holland v. Sulligent, Alabama, City of et al
as 6:2011cv01424
Plaintiff: Brian Holland
Defendant: Sulligent, Alabama, City of, Doug Noland, Arnold Blanchard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arnold v. Carter et al
as 2:2011cv00492
Plaintiff: Dearilo V. Arnold
Defendant: Earl N. Carter, Jr. and Heather Hartley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?