Cases 11 - 20 of 229
JACKSON v. SKAMARYCZ et al
as 3:2023cv00081
Plaintiff:
KRISTI C JACKSON
Defendant:
JESSICA A SKAMARYCZ and STACY W ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN v. HOOKS
as 4:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL B BROWN and MASON B BROWN
Defendant:
ROBERT HOOKS, KERTAVIOUS COPPINS, AARON GUILLAUME and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arnold v. FC Hunters Glen et al
as 1:2023cv01913
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Arnold
Defendant:
FC Hunters Glen doing business as Waters Edge Apartments, Weller Management, Adam Joffe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Glass v. Purdue et al
as 1:2023cv01868
Plaintiff:
Kardarius Kantrez Glass
Defendant:
Sonny Purdue, Davyd L. Mincey and Adam Kaye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Glass v. Raffensperger et al
as 1:2023cv01865
Plaintiff:
Kardarius Kantrez Glass
Defendant:
Brad Raffensperger, Davyd L. Mincey and Adam Kaye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Glass v. Kemp et al
as 1:2023cv01866
Plaintiff:
Kardarius Kantrez Glass
Defendant:
Brian P. Kemp, Davyd L. Mincey and Adam Kaye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Glass v. Deal et al
as 1:2023cv01864
Plaintiff:
Kardarius Kantrez Glass
Defendant:
Nathan Deal, Davyd L. Mincey and Adam Kaye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Hakeem v. Adams et al
as 6:2023cv00028
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Hakeem
Defendant:
Brian D. Adams, Jennifer Jarriel, Vashti J. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01185
Plaintiff:
Keisha Jones
Defendant:
Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC, Randell Jackson, Sheriff Tim Pounds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
