Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Knox v. City of Tuscaloosa et al
as 7:2016cv01560
Plaintiff:
Ronald Knox
Defendant:
City of Tuscaloosa , Steven D Anderson , Brad Mason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2015cv00393
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Weaver et al v. Town of Mt. Vernon, Alabama et al
as 1:2014cv00280
Plaintiff:
Robert Vinson Weaver and Chasity Johnson
Defendant:
Town of Mt. Vernon, Alabama, Town of McIntosh, Alabama, Robert Reid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Little v. Walker County Board of Education et al
as 6:2013cv01539
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Marie Little
Defendant:
Walker County Board of Education , Brad Ingle , Brenda Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2013cv01330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
McDaniel v. Cody et al (MAG+)
as 1:2011cv01054
Plaintiff:
Evester McDaniel
Defendant:
Romel Cody, Brad Mendheim, R. Cliff Mendheim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bethel et al v. Baldwin County Corrections Center et al
as 1:2010cv00648
Plaintiff:
Orlando Bethel and Glynis Bethel
Defendant:
Baldwin County Corrections Center, Baldwin County, Alabama, Huey Alfred Mack, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bethel et al v. Baldwin County Department of Human Resources et al
as 1:2010cv00614
Plaintiff:
Orlando Bethel and Glynis Bethel
Defendant:
Baldwin County Department of Human Resources, Bob Riley, State of Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
