Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Patel v. City of Madison, Alabama
as 5:2015cv00253
Plaintiff:
Sureshbhai Patel
Defendant:
City of Madison, Alabama and Eric Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crabtree v. City of Madison et al
as 5:2014cv01522
Defendant:
City of Madison, Larry P Muncey, Nicholas McRae and others
Plaintiff:
Melissa K. Olson Crabtree
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Maples v. CIty of Madison Board of Education
as 5:2014cv01031
Plaintiff:
Kristina Maples
Defendant:
CIty of Madison Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Guerrier v. The City of Decatur, Alabama et al
as 5:2014cv00482
Plaintiff:
Reba Guerrier
Defendant:
The City of Decatur, Alabama, Billy Cook, Jessica Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HILLS v. CITY OF MADISON, FLORIDA et al
as 4:2012cv00130
Plaintiff:
JOANN HILLS
Defendant:
CITY OF MADISON, FLORIDA and BENTON EBBERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011mc03599
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
McLEOD v. CITY OF MADISON FLORIDA et al
as 4:2011cv00349
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM D McLEOD
Defendant:
CITY OF MADISON FLORIDA, JODY STOROZUK, EMILY HUDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alabama Education Association et al v. Bentley et al
as 5:2011cv00761
Plaintiff:
Alabama Education Association , A-Vote , Pam Hill and others
Defendant:
Robert Bentley , Joseph B. Morton , David Perry and others
Intervenor_plaintiff:
PEBCO, Inc and ASEA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00463
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv00475
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
