Cases 11 - 20 of 67
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv22155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
KingLew Investments, Inc. et al v. United States Department of Agriculture Rural Development et al
as 2:2020cv00501
Defendant:
John W. Moncus, Jr., United States Department of Agriculture Rural Development, Debra Kennedy and others
Plaintiff:
KingLew Investments, Inc. and Lewis Giles, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BARR v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD & NUTRITION SERVICES
as 3:2020cv05455
Plaintiff:
DILLON MCDOUGLAS BARR, JR
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOOD & NUTRITION SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
v. Bonnett et al
as 0:2020cv60561
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Agriculture and Cameron Bonnett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Emrit v. President of the United States et al
as 1:2019cv20095
Defendant:
United States Department of Commerce, President of the United States, Federal Trade Commission and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv24381
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00448
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00290
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2017cv01906
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Justice v. Food and Nutrition Service, United States Department of Agriculture
as 1:2017cv04449
Plaintiff:
Theodore Justice
Defendant:
Food and Nutrition Service, United States Department of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
