Civil Rights Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2014cv60638
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Carr v. St. Vincent's Medical Center Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00085
Plaintiff: Samson Carr
Defendant: St. Vincent's Medical Center Inc. and Travis M. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2013cv60898
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Reed v. Rutherford et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00025
Plaintiff: Shirley Reed
Defendant: John H. Rutherford, Dennis Blankinchip, Michael Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Rutherford et al
as 3:2012cv01194
Plaintiff: Shirley A. Reed
Defendant: John H. Rutherford, Steve A. Zona, Dennis Blankinchip and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2012cv60758
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02739
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Rogers v. Blount County et al
as 2:2011cv01446
Plaintiff: Frankie Thomas Rogers
Defendant: Blount County, Sherry Burns, Arrington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caffey v. Alabama Supreme Court et al
as 2:2010cv03050
Plaintiff: Sherryl Snodgrass Caffey
Defendant: Alabama Supreme Court, Sue Bell Cobb, Champ Lyons, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00148
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?