Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Sims v. The City of Atlanta, Georgia et al
as 1:2017cv00519
Plaintiff:
Mildred Ann Sims
Defendant:
The City of Atlanta, Georgia , Patrick L. Labat , Major Lecounte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gillispie v. Federal Bureau of Investigators et al
as 1:2016cv03083
Plaintiff:
Kim Marie Gillispie
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigators, Fred Roselli, Victimized Families and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00516
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
DOUGLAS v. CITY OF AMERICUS GEORGIA et al
as 1:2015cv00012
Plaintiff:
BRANDON KENTRELL DOUGLAS
Defendant:
CITY OF AMERICUS GEORGIA, SUMTER COUNTY GEORGIA, BARRY BLOUNT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bell v. Clayton County Police Dept. et al
as 1:2014cv01242
Plaintiff:
Marcus Bell
Defendant:
Clayton County Police Dept., Freeman Mathis & Gary, Keith Singleton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WRIGHT v. SUMTER COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS AND REGISTRATION
as 1:2014cv00042
Special Master:
BERNARD GROFMAN
Plaintiff:
MATHIS KEARSE WRIGHT, JR
Defendant:
SUMTER COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS AND REGISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donley et al v. City of Morrow, Clayton County, GA et al
as 1:2012cv03207
Plaintiff:
Tiffiny Donley and Tony E. Mathis
Defendant:
City of Morrow, Clayton County, GA , Essie West , Jeff Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
JUVENILE et al v. MATHIS et al
as 5:2012cv00297
Plaintiff:
JUVENILE , LINDA GREEN and KIM SCOTT
Defendant:
THOMAS MATHIS , MARCUS CLARK , KATHY JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
MATHIS v. STATE OF GEORGIA
as 5:2012cv00039
Plaintiff:
JONAS MATHIS
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
