Cases 11 - 20 of 79
Patrick Roether v. State of Georgia, et al
as 22-10036
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PATRICK ROETHER and HOLLIE ROETHER
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF TENNESSEE, COUNTY OF MCINTOSH and others
Roether et al v. State of Georgia et al
as 2:2021cv00083
Defendant:
Isabella Amor, State of Georgia, State of Tennessee and others
Plaintiff:
Ambassador Patrick Roether and Hollie Roether
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv01375
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Smith v. Smith et al
as 1:2020cv00518
Defendant:
Instagram, Kyle ? (App Official From Ohio), App and others
Plaintiff:
Charlotte Prayton Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00896
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv05461
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Ruther v. Tennessee Governor
as 6:2019cv02251
Plaintiff:
L. Ruther
Defendant:
Tennessee Governor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANE v. SOUTHEAST CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL GROUP INC et al
as 1:2019cv00179
Plaintiff:
Hannah Bane, DESIREE BANE and DEIDRE TILLMAN
Defendant:
J. Does 1-10, LEE COUNTY GEORGIA, Reggie Rachals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bane v. Southeast Correctional Medical Group, Inc., a Tennessee Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00178
Defendant:
Southeast Correctional Medical Group, Inc., a Tennessee Corporation, LEE COUNTY GEORGIA, REGGIE RACHALS and others
Plaintiff:
Hannah Bane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01536
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
