Cases 21 - 30 of 1,888
Johnson et al v. MMI 82, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv10017
Plaintiff:
Akari Johnson and Hazel Thompson
Defendant:
MMI 82, LLC and The Enthusiast LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00789
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00711
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
BUSBY v. JOHNSON
as 3:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
JEREMY BUSBY
Defendant:
BOB JOHNSON, JOHN DOE 1 and JOHN DOE 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anglin v. ChildNet et al
as 1:2024cv20592
Plaintiff:
Valtshia Lashawn Denise Anglin
Defendant:
ChildNet, Jodi-ann Edwards, Tahnese Veer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00677
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Rona Adeoye v. Clayton County DFCS Employee(s), et al
as 24-10437
Plaintiff:
RONA JOHNSON ADEOYE
Defendant:
CLAYTON COUNTY DFCS EMPLOYEE(S), CLAYTON COUNTY JUVENILE COURT, CLAYTON COUNTY DEPARTMENT FAMILY CHILDREN SERVICES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00596
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (religion)
Morris v. Ross et al
as 5:2024cv00142
Plaintiff:
Shandra Morris
Defendant:
Officer Ross, Officer Perry, Chad Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fair Fight, Inc. v. Catherine Engelbrecht, et al
as 24-10372
Plaintiff:
FAIR FIGHT, INC.
Defendant:
CATHERINE ENGELBRECHT, DEREK SOMERVILLE, MARK DAVIS and others
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
