Cases 21 - 30 of 73
Stone v. Freeman Mathis & Gary et al
as 1:2019cv04051
Plaintiff:
Little G. Stone
Defendant:
Sun S. Choy and Freeman Mathis & Gary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02536
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv60753
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Mathis et al v. Eslinger et al
as 3:2019cv00274
Defendant:
Pamela J. Bondi, Donald Eslinger, April Kirsheman and others
Plaintiff:
Kelly B. Mathis and K.B. Mathis, PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mathis Wright, Jr. v. Sumter County Board of Electio
as 18-13510
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MATHIS KEARSE WRIGHT, JR.
Defendant / Appellant:
SUMTER COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS AND REGISTRATION
Mathis Wright, Jr. v. Sumter Co. Board of Elections
as 18-11510
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MATHIS KEARSE WRIGHT, JR., P O BOX 304 217 FORREST ST AMERICUS, GA 31709 229-924-0880
Defendant / Appellant:
SUMTER COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS AND REGISTRATION
Mathis Wright, Jr. v. Sumter Co. Board of Election
as 18-11510
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MATHIS KEARSE WRIGHT, JR., P O BOX 304 217 FORREST ST AMERICUS, GA 31709 229-924-0880
Defendant - Appellant:
SUMTER COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS AND REGISTRATION
Gilliam v. State of Florida
as 8:2017cv03011
Plaintiff:
Shawn Mathis Gilliam
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nadine McIndoo v. Broward County, et al
as 17-15010
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NADINE MCINDOO
Defendant - Appellee:
BROWARD COUNTY, MARICOPA COUNTY, AZ, CASSANDRA MATHIS-SCARBROUGH and others
ADKISON v. BAY COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS et al
as 5:2017cv00070
Plaintiff:
JAMES C ADKISON
Defendant:
BAY COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, SUE SHEHANS PARKER, JERRY LEDELL PARKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
