Cases 21 - 30 of 47
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2015cv61247
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2014cv02397
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Tony Mathis v. Essie West, et al
as 14-12038
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONY E. MATHIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF MORROW, GEORGIA, CURTIS TURNER, Morrow City Police Officer, City of Morrow, in his individual capacity, ESSIE WEST, Clerk of Court, City of Morrow, in her individual capacity and others
Defendant:
JERRY PATRICK, JOHN DEFOOR, ALISHA NASH and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv04151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Donley et al v. City of Morrow, Clayton County, GA et al
as 1:2012cv03207
Plaintiff:
Tiffiny Donley and Tony E. Mathis
Defendant:
City of Morrow, Clayton County, GA , Essie West , Jeff Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-12778
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-12777
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Youhoing et al v. Clayton County Police Department et al
as 1:2012cv00736
Plaintiff:
Shennielle Shelle Youhoing, Mahabir Nanan, Mohaberry D. Youhoing-Nanan and others
Defendant:
Clayton County Police Department, Clayton County Sheriff Department, Clayton County Animal Control and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
