Cases 21 - 30 of 482
Benton v. Russell, et al
as 3:2023cv01259
Plaintiff:
Kenneth E. Benton
Defendant:
Tracy Ann Russell, David Stephens and William K. Davis, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roberts v. Carlson
as 1:2023cv04832
Plaintiff:
Matthew Robert and Matthew Roberts
Defendant:
Russel Carlson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
A.K.J. et al v. Roundtree et al
as 1:2023cv00153
Plaintiff:
A. K. J. and Keyana Gaines
Defendant:
Richard Roundtree, Leslie Gaiter, Richard Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
The People of the State of Georgia, ex rel. et al v. Neville et al
as 2:2023cv00215
Plaintiff:
The People of the State of Georgia, ex rel. and Terence J. Sweeney
Defendant:
Richard Neville, Walker H. Bramlett, Pamela D. Bowels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
J.B.R. v. Carlson
as 1:2023cv04505
Plaintiff:
J.B.R.
Defendant:
Russel Carlson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Richardson v. Hutchinson et al
as 1:2023cv03948
Plaintiff:
Temetrius Richardson
Defendant:
Russell Hutchinson and Ally Financial
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
David Foley, Jr., et al v. Orange County, et al
as 23-12740
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID WASH FOLEY, JR. and JENNIFER T. FOLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
ORANGE COUNTY, ASIMA M. AZAM, TIM BOLDIG and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
