Civil Rights Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 38 of 38
Olson v. Dier et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2010cv01771
Plaintiff: Matthew Olson
Defendant: Kenneth Dier, Daniel Robbins, Elizabeth Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2010cv61396
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv00197
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00141
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 rt Job Discrimination/Retaliation
Campbell v. Vargas Subs, Inc. et al
as 0:2010cv60097
Plaintiff: Nolan R. Campbell
Defendant: Vargas Subs, Inc. and Twenty-Five Olson, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Peoples First Community Bank v. Langley et al
as 5:2009cv00548
Plaintiff: Peoples First Community Bank and Peoples First Community Bank
Defendant: Richard H. Langley, Roxbury Ventures, LLC, Richard H. Langley, Jr. and others
Third Party Defendant: Howey-in-the Hills, Kenneth Green, Robert Olson and others
Third Party Plaintiff: Richard H. Langley
Counter Claimant: Richard H. Langley
Counter Defendant: Peoples First Community Bank and Peoples First Community Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Page v. Olson et al
as 1:2008cv02351
Plaintiff: Andre C. Page
Defendant: Frank R. Olson, John D. Andrle, Michael C. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv01201
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?