Cases 31 - 40 of 321
Carey Hall v. Franklins Spring Creek Ford
as 23-10568
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CAREY HALL
Defendant / Appellee:
FRANKLINS SPRING CREEK FORD
Eaddy v. Continental Properties LLC 120
as 8:2023cv00234
Plaintiff:
Kwame A. Eaddy
Defendant:
Continental Properties LLC 120 doing business as Springs at Palma Sola
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00503
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Caudle v. Fulton County et al
as 1:2023cv00161
Plaintiff:
Allen Okechukwu Caudle
Defendant:
Fulton County, State of Georgia, City of Sandy Springs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Caudle v. United States of America et al
as 1:2022cv04865
Plaintiff:
Allen Okechukwu Caudle
Defendant:
United States of America, Fulton County, State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv22340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2022cv61979
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2022cv81537
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Caudle v. Overton County TN et al
as 5:2022cv01221
Plaintiff:
Allen Caudle
Defendant:
Overton County TN, State of Tennessee, State of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv03697
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
