Cases 41 - 50 of 125
Anderson et al v. Raffensperger et al
as 1:2020cv03263
Defendant:
Thomas Mahoney, III, Wandy Taylor, David C. Fedack and others
Plaintiff:
Sara Alami, Democratic Party of Georgia, Inc., DSCC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02940
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1683
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02764
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
The New Georgia Project et al v. Raffensperger et al
as 1:2020cv01986
Defendant:
Tim McFalls, John Mangano, Brad Raffensperger and others
Plaintiff:
Reagan Jennings, The New Georgia Project, Candace Woodall and others
Amicus Curiae:
Public Interest Legal Foundation and Landmark Legal Foundation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00088
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Gilbert v. Florida Department of State et al
as 1:2020cv21225
Defendant:
Florida Department of Highway Safety Motor Vehicles, Florida Department of State and Miami-Dade
Plaintiff:
Maurice Antwan Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STATE OF FLORIDA v. EL et al
as 4:2020cv00045
Defendant:
MILTON MAURICE HALL, LASHAWN HALL and ARIES OBA EL
Plaintiff:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DAVIS et al v. LOUIS S ROBERTS III et al
as 5:2019cv00537
Defendant:
LOUIS S ROBERTS III and ZACHARY WESTER
Plaintiff:
MAURICE ELDER and CASSANDRA E DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Early v. Fairfield, City of, Alabama et al
as 2:2019cv01924
Defendant:
Maurice Parnell and Fairfield, City of, Alabama
Plaintiff:
Naomi Early
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barberi v. Happy Pappy Subs Inc. et al
as 0:2019cv62413
Defendant:
Marlene K. Maurice and Happy Pappy Subs Inc.
Plaintiff:
Renzo Barberi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
