Cases 61 - 70 of 294
DiStefano v. Cook et al
as 8:2021cv02529
Plaintiff:
Anthony V. DiStefano
Defendant:
Martha J. Cook, Melissa M. Polo, Denise A. Pomponio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2021cv00132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood v. Office of the State Attorney et al
as 8:2021cv02292
Plaintiff:
Belinda Wood
Defendant:
Office of the State Attorney, Alex Moia, Douglas Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. City of Lakeland, Florida et al
as 8:2021cv02280
Plaintiff:
Brandon Morris
Defendant:
City of Lakeland, Jeremy Williams, Cory Bowling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00359
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
BATCHELOR et al v. ROLSTON et al
as 4:2021cv00232
Defendant:
PAUL ROLSTON, NAKAMOTO GROUP, INC. and NAKAMOTO GROUP INC
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER CASTRO, QRUINTRELL COOK, CONNIE BATCHELOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COOKS v. MINYARD et al
as 3:2021cv00776
Defendant:
CORPORAL THOMAS PASCHAL, GULF COAST AUTOPSY PHYSICIANS, TRACY MORTON MEMORIAL CHAPEL, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RANADA COOKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Elisha Gilbert, Jr. v. Georgia Department of Driver, et al
as 21-11450
Defendant / Appellee:
PINE LAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT, PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, INC. (PFM), et al., M. SCOTT, Badge #3717 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELISHA GILBERT, JR., Trustee; Under Agreement with Elisha Gilbert, Jr., Trust
Adams v. Cook
as 3:2021cv00323
Plaintiff:
Warren Adams
Defendant:
Clay County Sheriff's Office and Michelle Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
