Cases 61 - 70 of 94
Shaw v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2013cv04131
Plaintiff:
James Shaw
Defendant:
City of Atlanta , Atlanta Police Department , Drew Bahry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Sands v. Palm Beach County Sheriff Office et al
as 9:2013cv81031
Defendant:
Palm Beach County Sheriff Office , Beth Rosenthal, David Vitola and others
Plaintiff:
William Sands
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Morgan v. Dukes et al
as 1:2013cv00592
Plaintiff:
Christina Morgan
Defendant:
O. L. Dukes, The City of Clarkston Police Department and John and/or Jane Doe's 1-5
Morgan v. Jackson et al
as 1:2013cv00273
Plaintiff:
Patricia D. Morgan
Defendant:
Theodore Jackson, C. Daugherty, T. Isley and others
Evans v. Robinson et al
as 1:2012cv04096
Plaintiff:
Andrew Derrick Evans
Defendant:
Cathelene Tina Robinson , Erica Ashley Alexander , John Does 1-5 and others
Kopperud v. Mabry et al
as 1:2012cv03503
Plaintiff:
Robert Kopperud
Defendant:
Dexter Mabry, Damien Butler and John Does 1 - 5
Janice Williams, et al v. Roland Boehrer, et al
as 12-14803
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JANICE WILLIAMS, as mother of David Nave Jr., & next friend of the Estate of David Nave Jr. and DAVID NAVE, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
ROLAND K BOEHRER, KIRBY G. THREAT, KEMUEL KIMBROUGH, in his official capacity and others
Watson v. Earthbound Holding, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv02263
Plaintiff:
William Watson
Defendant:
Earthbound Holding, LLC and John Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Bannerman et al v. Kolackovsky et al
as 1:2012cv22166
Plaintiff:
Diane Shaw Bannerman , Ericka Bannerman-Williams and Audrey Bannerman
Defendant:
Stephen Kolackovsky , Barbara Palmer , John Mulcahy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Butler v. Schiralli et al
as 1:2012cv00872
Plaintiff:
Kenneth David Butler
Defendant:
David Schiralli, Jon P. Doherty, Darryl J. Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
