Cases 71 - 80 of 824
Chew v. FCC
as 5:2023cv00257
Plaintiff:
Martin Richard Chew
Defendant:
FCC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00508
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
R Erik, LLC v. Martin County
as 2:2023cv14109
Plaintiff:
R Erik, LLC
Defendant:
Martin County and Paws JJBCR LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Elias Makere v. Martin Fitzpatrick, et al
as 23-11231
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELIAS MAKERE
Defendant / Appellee:
MARTIN FITZPATRICK, CHARLES J. SCHREIBER, JR., MARK E. WALKER and others
Hamman v. University of Central Florida Board of Trustees, et al
as 6:2023cv00395
Plaintiff:
Al Hamman
Defendant:
University of Central Florida Board of Trustees, Alex Martins, Harold Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
William Martin, et al v. Mauricio Duran, et al
as 23-10841
Plaintiff / Appellee:
WILLIAM MARTIN and MICHAEL MARTIN
Defendant / Appellant:
MAURICIO DURAN and BRIDGET DOYLE
H.M. v. Nicholas Castoro, et al
as 23-10762
Plaintiff / Appellant:
H.M.
Defendant / Appellee:
NICHOLAS VINCENT CASTORO and MARTIN COUNTY SHERIFF
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00764
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Heath et al v. MHM Correctional Services, LLC et al
as 6:2023cv00009
Plaintiff:
Jerrod Antonio Heath, Crishaun Heath, Christen Heath and others
Defendant:
MHM Correctional Services, LLC, MHM Services, Inc., Board of Regents of the University System of Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
