Cases 81 - 90 of 490
PATTERSON v. SPROUL et al
as 1:2021cv00154
Plaintiff:
ROLONDA PATTERSON
Defendant:
KEVIN SPROUL, DOUGHERTY COUNTY, PHOEBE PHYSICIANS GROUP, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv23028
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0621
Bell v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 1:2021cv00110
Plaintiff:
William E. Bell
Defendant:
United States Department of Veterans Affairs and State Farm Bank doing business as State Farm Mutual "Good Neighbor" Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harmon v. Alabama, State of et al
as 1:2021cv00947
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Claude Harmon, Jr
Defendant:
Alabama, State of, Calhoun County, Cleburne County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00219
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
RODEMAKER v. CITY OF VALDOSTA BOARD OF EDUCATION et al
as 7:2021cv00076
Defendant:
KELISA BROWN, TYRA HOWARD, LIZ SHUMPHARD and others
Plaintiff:
ALAN RODEMAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Bell v. Raffensperger et al
as 1:2021cv02486
Plaintiff:
Andrew W. Bell
Defendant:
Chris Harvey and Brad Raffensperger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv00999
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Bell v. Birmingham Board of Education et al
as 2:2021cv00703
Defendant:
George Washington Carver High, Mr. Mullins and Birmingham Board of Education
Plaintiff:
DeKorrie K Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
