Cases 1 - 10 of 900
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01298
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Williams v. State of Alabama et al
as 6:2024cv01262
Defendant:
State of Alabama and Walker County Sheriff's Office
Plaintiff:
Luke Williams, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01257
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Kelly v. Alabama Alcohol Control Board et al
as 2:2024cv00575
Defendant:
Eric Jensen, Charles Price, Vernon Barnett and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Mobile Police Department
as 1:2024cv00323
Defendant:
Mobile Police Department
Plaintiff:
Wendy M. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Judah v. City of Dothan et al
as 2:2024cv00552
Defendant:
Hunter Sanders, Casey Beck, William E Benny and others
Plaintiff:
Valerie D. Judah
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Judah v. The City of Dothan, Alabama et al
as 1:2024cv00552
Defendant:
William E Benny, The City of Dothan, Alabama, Hunter Sanders and others
Plaintiff:
Valerie Dawson Judah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Norton v. Walton et al
as 3:2024cv00515
Plaintiff:
William Norton
Defendant:
Deputy Eller and Corporal Walton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Postal Service of Prichard et al
as 1:2024cv00273
Defendant:
Mobile, Alabama Post Office and Postal Service of Prichard
Plaintiff:
Wendy M. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Williams v. Department of Justice
as 1:2024cv00276
Defendant:
Department of Justice
Plaintiff:
Jay Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
