Cases 1 - 10 of 546
Gwendolyn Perryman v. Mary Teague, et al
as 24-11936
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN A. PERRYMAN
Defendant:
MARY TEAGUE and BRENT HALL
Brett v. Trump et al
as 5:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Defendant:
Don Trump, William Bahr, David Samson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wihly Harpo-Brown v. Daniel Craig, et al
as 24-11610
Plaintiff:
WIHLY HARPO-BROWN
Defendant:
DANIEL J. CRAIG, In his Official and Individual Capacities, MATHEW ROBINS, In his Official and Individual Capacities, ASHA JACKSON, In her Individual and Official Capacity and others
Caryn Yost-Rudge, et al v. The City of Stuart, et al
as 24-11481
Plaintiff:
CARYN HALL YOST-RUDGE and WILLIAM JOHN RUDGE, IV
Defendant:
THE CITY OF STUART, A TO Z PROPERTIES, INC, PAUL J. NICOLETTI and others
Bey et al v. City of Dothan, Alabama et al (MAG+)
as 1:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Noble Halona Bey, Latonya Dorsey and Mama T's, LLC
Defendant:
City of Dothan, Alabama, Stephanie Wingfield, Allison Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anesha Parker v. Roseberte Clervil, et al
as 24-11293
Plaintiff:
ANESHA PARKER
Defendant:
ROSEBERTE CLERVIL, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and others
Hall v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00400
Plaintiff:
William Stephen Hall
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
Johnathan Hall v. City of Miami Beach, et al
as 1:2024cv20980
Defendant:
Johnathan Hall, City of Miami Beach, Alvero Leon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
