Cases 1 - 10 of 4,678
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01298
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Williams v. Pearson Police Department et al
as 5:2024cv00070
Defendant:
Pearson Police Department, City of Pearson and Derrick Touchton
Plaintiff:
Keon Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00142
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Discrimination Based on Sex or Blindness - Education
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00323
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Discrimination Based on Sex or Blindness - Education
Williams v. State of Alabama et al
as 6:2024cv01262
Defendant:
State of Alabama and Walker County Sheriff's Office
Plaintiff:
Luke Williams, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ryhme v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv04156
Plaintiff:
Carla Ryhme
Defendant:
Jordan McDonald, Robert Toole, Corey Abrams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 (1)Removal from State Court - Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01257
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv01672
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
CLAYTON v. CONE et al
as 1:2024cv00139
Defendant:
JOHN OR JANE DOE, DEBRA SANDERS, Dr WYNN and others
Plaintiff:
JACK CLAYTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00311
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
