Cases 1 - 10 of 91
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Robertson v. Hydromax USA et al
as 2:2024cv00409
Plaintiff:
Fatuma Robertson
Defendant:
Hydromax USA and Tommy Chandler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Nails v. St Joesph's /Chandler et al
as 2:2023cv01734
Plaintiff:
Angela Nails
Defendant:
St Joesph's /Chandler, Karen Turner and Dajaunia James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01574
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Kendall v. Chandler Residential
as 1:2023cv03965
Plaintiff:
Marshaun Kendall
Defendant:
Chandler Residential
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act (1993)
KHAN, M.D. v. Stephen et al
as 9:2023cv80702
Plaintiff:
DR SAEED AKHTAR KHAN and SAEED AKHTAR KHAN, M.D.
Defendant:
Noel E. Stephen, JAVIER A. GONZALEZ, TERESA CHANDLER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
MCLEOD v. MALPHUS
as 1:2022cv00132
Consolidated Plaintiff:
JERRY MCLEOD
Defendant:
BECKY MALPHUS, BECKEY MALPHUS, CHANDLER GIDDES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
