Cases 1 - 10 of 62
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-10540
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01313
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Jones v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01185
Plaintiff:
Keisha Jones
Defendant:
Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC, Randell Jackson, Sheriff Tim Pounds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00401
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Booth v. Douglas County et al
as 1:2023cv00326
Plaintiff:
John David Booth
Defendant:
Douglas County, Georgia Douglas County Sheriff's Office, Sheriff Deputy Matthew Christopher Atkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fisher et al v. Smith et al
as 1:2022cv01297
Plaintiff:
John T. Fisher, III, Annie S. Fisher, Sara D. Murray and others
Defendant:
Abner Smith, Jonathan Kasper, Dana Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Bramber et al v. Herrera et al
as 1:2021cv04956
Plaintiff:
Marian Bramber, Reginald Bramber, J. Blair Craig and others
Defendant:
Ann J. Herrera, Esq., Dan Britt Jr. and Associates, Tiku & Associates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. City Of Douglas County Georgia
as 1:2021cv04443
Plaintiff:
Deon D. Jones
Defendant:
City Of Douglas County Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01151
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Stone v. Douglas County Sheriff's Office
as 1:2019cv03834
Plaintiff:
Little G. Stone
Defendant:
Douglas County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
