Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Ninth Amendment Party Association et al v. Rambosk et al
as 2:2023cv00830
Plaintiff:
Ninth Amendment Party Association and Milton Gerard Esquibel
Defendant:
Kevin Rambosk, Clovis Watson, Jr., Scotty Rhoden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morgan v. Gentry et al
as 5:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Brandon Anthony Morgan
Defendant:
Alex Gentry, Austin Patton, Karen Darby and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02572
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Darby v. Ekwerekwu et al
as 0:2023cv60961
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Darby
Defendant:
Chukwueme Ekwerekwu, Jeffrey M. Kunzel, Robert D. Bacon Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
McDonald v. United States Attorney General et al
as 4:2022cv10097
Defendant:
Steven Darby McDonald, United States Attorney General, Unknown Navy Seal Members and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Darby v. Jekyll Island Authority
as 2:2021cv00029
Plaintiff:
Otis L. Darby
Defendant:
Jekyll Island Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buckelew v. Darby et al
as 8:2020cv02511
Defendant:
Thomas Knight, John Robertson, Russell Luce and others
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Buckelew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Darby II v. United Automobile Insurance Company et al
as 1:2020cv22777
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Darby II
Defendant:
United Automobile Insurance Company and Katherine Fernandez Rundle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinson v. Darby et al
as 5:2020cv00430
Defendant:
William Darby and City of Huntsville
Plaintiff:
Douglas C. Martinson, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leeroy Jones v. Darby Wright
as 17-13133
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEEROY JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
DARBY WRIGHT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
