Cases 1 - 7 of 7
CARPENTER v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 5:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Jordan Carpenter and Jordan Carpenter on behalf of the Estate of Dennis Carpernter
Defendant:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Danielle Rawl, Brittney Beard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Richardson v. Family Court et al
as 2:2019cv00728
Defendant:
Family Court and DHR
Plaintiff:
John Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00324
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Richardson v. Mobile Sheriff's Department
as 1:2019cv00024
Plaintiff:
John Richardson
Defendant:
Mobile Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael McGuire v. John Richardson
as 15-11142
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICHAEL A. MCGUIRE
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN RICHARDSON
Michael McGuire v. Luther Strange, III, et al
as 15-10958
Plaintiff - Appellant-Cross Appellee:
MICHAEL A. MCGUIRE
Defendant - Appellee-Cross Appellant:
LUTHER J. STRANGE, III, Attorney General for the State of Alabama, in his official and individual capacites (individual capacity termed per [134] Order) and JOHN RICHARDSON, Acting Director of the Alabama Department of Public Safetyand that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d)(1), future proceedings shall be in the name of the substituted party, in his official capacity
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF MONTGOMERY, a muncipal corporation of Montgomery County of Alabama, TODD STRANGE, Mayor of the City of Montgomery, sued in his official and individual capacities (individual capacity termed per [134] Order), DERRICK CUNNINGHAM, in his official capacity as Montgomery County Sheriff and others
:
SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00602
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
