Cases 1 - 10 of 12
BARGE v. CHILDERS et al
as 3:2023cv24737
Petitioner:
MELISSA BARGE
Respondent:
PAM CHILDERS, SCOTT LUNSFORD and CHRIS JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03835
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01737
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
City of Stockbridge, Georgia et al v. Tina Lunsford et al
as 1:2018cv03961
Plaintiff:
Elton Alexander, John Blount, Urban Redevelopment Agency of the City of Stockbridge and others
Defendant:
Tina Lunsford, Secretary of State Brian Kemp, Nathan Deal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Capital One Public Funding, LLC v. Lunsford et al
as 1:2018cv03938
Defendant:
Andy Calloway, Tina Lunsford, Jon Kirkpatrick and others
Plaintiff:
Capital One Public Funding, LLC
Intervenor Defendant:
Judy Smith, Vikki Consiglio and Kathryn R. Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00008
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Drisin v. The Florida International University Board of Trustees et al
as 1:2016cv24939
Plaintiff:
Adam Drisin
Defendant:
THE FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES, Mark B. Rosenberg, Shirlyon McWhorter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv04104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01612
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv03443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
