Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Lavina et al v. Florida Prepaid College Board et al
as 0:2024cv60001
Plaintiff:
Erica Lavina and Andrea Darlow
Defendant:
Florida Prepaid College Board, John Rood, Adria D Starkey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv02328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00505
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv00504
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00277
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Singleton v. Johnson et al
as 4:2020cv00131
Defendant:
Mayor Van R. Johnson, City of Savannah Georgia and R. Bates Lovett
Plaintiff:
Neil K. Singleton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
SAULS et al v. HOBBY
as 1:2019cv00081
Plaintiff:
Zachery Lovett and Timothy Sauls
Defendant:
SHERIFF JEFF HOBBY and JEFF HOBBY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lakoskey et al v. Floro et al
as 3:2018cv01421
Plaintiff:
Mary Penelope Lakoskey and Amos Lovett
Defendant:
Valerie J. Rao, Bonifacio T. Floro, Margarita Arruza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04976
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
