Cases 1 - 10 of 143
Wihly Harpo-Brown v. Intermark Management Corporation, et al
as 24-11073
Plaintiff:
WIHLY HARPO-BROWN
Defendant:
INTERMARK MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, WILLIAM AUSTIN PRUITT, JACOB T. HAYES and others
Walker v. Atlanta Fulton County et al
as 1:2024cv00342
Plaintiff:
Mario D. Walker
Defendant:
Atlanta Fulton County and State of GA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mario Moya v. Officer Sterling Jackson, et al
as 23-13446
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARIO MOYA
Defendant / Appellee:
STERLING JACKSON and CITY OF CHAMBLEE, GEORGIA
Duarte v. Fedex Freight, Inc.
as 6:2022cv02358
Plaintiff:
Mario Duarte
Defendant:
Fedex Freight, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv01673
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jones et al v. Bergoglio et al
as 8:2023cv01613
Plaintiff:
Terese E. Jones
Defendant:
Pope Francis Jorge Mario Bergoglio and Tracy B. Magwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Caplan v. Top Line Auto Service, Inc. et al
as 0:2023cv61359
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant:
Top Line Auto Service, Inc., Mario Lucarelli and Mary Jo Lucarelli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv22257
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Pee v. Zimmerman et al
as 9:2023cv80921
Plaintiff:
Joshua Andre Pee
Defendant:
Officer Johnathan Zimmerman, Captain Strickland Kevin, Sergeant Mario Alarcon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
St. Forin v. Florida Department of Revenue et al
as 9:2023cv81028
Plaintiff:
Mario St. Forin
Defendant:
Florida Department of Revenue, Florida Department of Children & Families and Melbourne Courthouse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
