Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv02210
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Dowd v. Aronberg et al
as 9:2018cv80054
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd Dowd
Defendant:
David Aronberg and Sharon R. Bock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dowd v. Palm Beach County Florida Sheriff Department et al
as 9:2017cv81340
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd Dowd
Defendant:
Palm Beach County Florida Sheriff Department and WPTV News Channel 5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dowd v. Florida State Department of Children and Families et al
as 9:2017cv81286
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd Dowd
Defendant:
Florida State Department of Children and Families, West Palm Beach Police Department and Courtney Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Snipes v. Volusia County
as 16-14221
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL TODD SNIPES
Defendant - Appellee:
VOLUSIA COUNTY, a political subdivision of the state of Florida
Kenneth Camp, et al v. City of Pelham
as 14-14804
Plaintiff - Appellee:
KENNETH CAMP, MICHAEL TODD MCCARVER, PATRICK SMITH and others
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF PELHAM
Snipes v. Volusia County
as 6:2014cv00413
Plaintiff:
Michael Todd Snipes
Defendant:
Volusia County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joe Young v. Michael Simpson, et al
as 13-13361
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOE T. YOUNG
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL TODD SIMPSON, Individually, KENNY ELLIS, Individually, JASON DIXON, Individually and others
Barber et al v. Bice et al
as 2:2013cv00296
Plaintiff:
Albert Barber, Jr. , Carol Barber , Michael Todd and others
Defendant:
Tommy Bice , Ed Richardson and State Board of Education, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 Voting Rights Act
Young v. Simpson et al
as 2:2012cv00142
Plaintiff:
Joe T. Young
Defendant:
Michael Todd Simpson, Kenny Ellis, Jason Dixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
