Civil Rights Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv60841
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv04240
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2015cv02040
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00703
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Cynthia Mingo v. City of Mobile, Alabama We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-15828
Plaintiff - Appellant: CYNTHIA MINGO, as personal representative of the estate of Daniel Mingo
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF MOBILE, ALABAMA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02518
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Vadis Frone v. City of Riverdale, Georgia, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-12750
Plaintiff - Appellant: VADIS J FRONE
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF RIVERDALE, GEORGIA, NATHANIAL MINGO, Riverdale Court Service Manager and RONALD FREEMAN, Riverdale Court Judge
Mingo v. City of Mobile, Alabama We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00056
Plaintiff: Cynthia Mingo
Defendant: City of Mobile, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Frone v. City of Riverdale et al
as 1:2011cv03358
Plaintiff: Vadis J. Frone, Sr.
Defendant: City of Riverdale, Ronald Freeman and Nathanial Mingo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mingo v. City of Mobile
as 1:2010cv00059
Plaintiff: Daniel Mingo
Defendant: City of Mobile
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?