Cases 1 - 10 of 607
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60909
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00669
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21884
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Lambert v. US Dept of Veterans Affairs
as 9:2024cv80619
Plaintiff:
Donna Lambert
Defendant:
US Dept of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60808
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Christopher Miles v. Patent Professors Corporation, et al
as 24-11417
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MATTHEWS MILES
Defendant:
PATENT PROFESSORS CORPORATION, HEALTH INDUSTRY and ALL OTHER ENTITIES USING HDS PLAN ATTRIBUTES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21634
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Adam Pajer v. Disney Parks, Experiences and Products, Inc., et al
as 24-11146
Plaintiff:
ADAM PAJER
Defendant:
DISNEY PARKS, EXPERIENCES AND PRODUCTS, INC., WALT DISNEY PARKS AND RESORTS US, INC. and REEDY CREEK IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Bouaddallah v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection
as 3:2024cv00321
Plaintiff:
Richard Bouaddallah
Defendant:
US Customs and Border Protection and U.S. Customs and Border Protection
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 983 Civil Forfeiture Proceedings
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
