Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Leeper v. Pierson et al
as 8:2017cv02169
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Rene Leeper
Defendant:
R. E. Pierson, Special Agent Scroggs, Special Agent Riggins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sirica Bumpus v. Harrell Watts, et al
as 15-11846
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SIRICA BUMPUS
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRELL WATTS, administrator for national inmate appeals, G. DUNCAN, a unit manager, WARDEN and others
Marrow v. Rutherford et al
as 3:2012cv01361
Plaintiff:
James Edward Marrow
Defendant:
John Rutherford , R. E. Vercruysse , J. A. Ruiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv04068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Ahlfinger et al v. Gwinnet County, Georgia et al
as 1:2011cv02728
Plaintiff:
Jody Ahlfinger and Michael Schwartz
Defendant:
Gwinnett County, Georgia , Charles Walters , Lyndsey Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Schwartz v. Gwinnett County, Georgia et al
as 1:2011cv02727
Plaintiff:
Derrick Schwartz
Defendant:
Gwinnett County, Georgia , Charles Walters , Lyndsey Perry and others
Counter_claimant:
Charles Walters , Tonya Holter , Gwinnett County, Georgia and others
Counter_defendant:
Derrick Schwartz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv00857
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Goyco et al v. Bannum, Inc. et al
as 6:2007cv00622
Plaintiff:
Jose Gilberto Serrano Goyco
Defendant:
Bannum, Inc., Bureau of Prisons, Callie P. Farr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2005cv01308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
