Cases 1 - 10 of 437
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00261
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
State of Alabama v. Berger
as 1:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama
Defendant:
Kenneth Douglas Berger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Berger v. 22nd State Bank et al
as 1:2024cv00187
Plaintiff:
The State of Alabama
Not Yet Classified:
Kenneth Berger
Defendant:
22nd State Bank, Christopher Watkins, FEB Bancshares Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Angela Nails v. State of Alabama, et al
as 24-11331
Plaintiff:
ANGELA DENISE NAILS
Defendant:
STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CARRIER, ANDREW HAMLIN and others
Michael McGuire, et al v. Attorney General, State of Alabama, et al
as 24-11731
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A. MCGUIRE, J E B and K L L
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA and SECRETARY OF THE ALABAMA LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY
State of Alabama v. Scully
as 1:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Berger and State of Alabama
Defendant:
Defacto Judge William E. Scully, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Berger v. Skully et al
as 1:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Berger
Defendant:
William E. Skully, Jr, J. Dean, Michele M. Thomason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Linker v. State of Alabama
as 1:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Linker Christopher Ryan and Christopher Ryan Linker
Defendant:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
State of Alabama et al v. Nelson
as 1:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
STATE OF ALABAMA and ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Defendant:
Otis Nelson
State of Alabama et al v. Phelps (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00561
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama and Alabama Department of Corrections
Defendant:
Wilfred Phelps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
