Cases 1 - 10 of 115
Davis v. Stokes et al
as 6:2024cv01113
Plaintiff:
Semiya Tahira Davis
Defendant:
Brain D. Stokes, Andrew Asher Bain and Dr. Andrea Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv22031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jackson v. Escambia County Courthouse et al
as 1:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Jackson
Defendant:
Escambia County Courthouse, James Hart Lawyers Firm, Stokes & Stokes Lawyers Firm and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moliere Dimanche, Jr. v. Takela Jackson, et al
as 24-11267
Plaintiff:
MOLIERE DIMANCHE, JR.
Defendant:
TAKELA JACKSON, RABIH TABBARA, NICOLAS LUCIANO MONTES and others
Riley v. Clayton County, Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv01567
Plaintiff:
Cordero Riley
Defendant:
Clayton County, Georgia, Jeffrey Turner, Alieka Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv14050
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv14051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Jackson v. BET Entertainment et al
as 1:2023cv00196
Defendant:
Stokes & Stokes Law Firm, BET Entertainment, Stokes & Stokes and others
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stokes v. Town of Flomaton
as 1:2023cv00324
Plaintiff:
Bennie Stokes
Defendant:
Town of Flomaton
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
