Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05615
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
WRIGHT v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00324
Plaintiff:
Christopher Wright
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, JOHN DOE, WARDEN BENJAMIN FORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Canning v. Jackson et al
as 6:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
John Canning
Defendant:
Shirley Jackson, Fnu Olowsky, Trevonza Bobbitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crisp v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2022cv02057
Plaintiff:
Sergeant Nathan D. Crisp
Defendant:
The State of Georgia, State Employee Scot W. Schunk, State Employee ADA Toole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00529
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Canning v. Jackson et al
as 1:2022cv00339
Plaintiff:
John Canning
Defendant:
Shirley Jackson, Fnu Olowsky, Trevonza Bobbitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crisp v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2021cv00175
Defendant:
Tuwanda Rush Williams, Brittanie Browning, David D. Pritchett and others
Plaintiff:
Sergeant Nathan D. Crisp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00159
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Baldwin v. Daniel et al
as 6:2017cv00048
Plaintiff:
Debra Renee Wenndt Baldwin
Defendant:
Brandon Daniel , Shalonda Nicole Robinson , Carl Anthony Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
