Cases 1 - 10 of 222
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00548
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00921
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-10540
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20564
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20567
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
GRAHAM v. CRISP REGIONAL HOSPITAL
as 1:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
HILDA GRAHAM
Defendant:
CRISP REGIONAL HOSPITAL, PAVEL BOMAR, MARISSA BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Waters v. Officer Calderon et al
as 0:2023cv61681
Plaintiff:
Vicki Waters, Brieanna Muldrew and Rian Muldrew
Defendant:
Officer Andrea Calderon, Officer Alejandro Escobar, Officer Amanda Cummings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Waters v. Calderon et al
as 0:2023cv61674
Plaintiff:
Vicki Waters
Defendant:
Andrea Calderon, Alejandro Escobar, Amanda Cummings and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
WALTER v. BUTLER et al
as 4:2023cv00379
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN WALTER and ADRIAN TYSHAWN WALTER
Defendant:
VICKI BUTLER, NEIL, THE KEARNEY CENTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
